Ulysses
Ulysses
Why Ukraine prevailed in most denial of justice cases: denial of justice explored

Why Ukraine prevailed in most denial of justice cases: denial of justice explored

It is no surprise that foreign investors regularly assert denial of justice claims against Ukraine, as its courts are widely criticised for corruption, lack of independence and inefficiency.

What is surprising is that most of denial of justice claims against Ukraine failed.

Oleh  Marchenko, Anastasia Kotliarchuk and Nikolay Yurlov in their article for The European Arbitration Review 2022 discuss why and explore denial of justice from a wider perspective of investor-state, ECtHR, ICJ and EU jurisprudence.

This may be of interest to you

DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Jun 14, 2022

Shattered Immunities of Aggressor: How Courts Make Russia Pay for Its War
Open case

Shattered Immunities of Aggressor: How Courts Make Russia Pay for Its War

Under customary international law, States and their properties are protected by immunity from the jurisdiction of foreign courts and immunity from the execution of judgments....

DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Nov 17, 2021

GAR 2022: Why Ukraine Prevailed in Most Denial of Justice Cases: Denial of Justice Explored
Open case

GAR 2022: Why Ukraine Prevailed in Most Denial of Justice Cases: Denial of Justice Explored

Oleh Marchenko, Anastasiia Kotliarchuk and Nick Yurlov prepared an article for The European Arbitration Review 2022, dedicated to the topic “Why Ukraine Prevailed in Most...

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. 

Read More